The photograph analyzed here (PSP_005330_1275) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 15 September 2007. NASA describes the photograph as ‘Hellespontus Region Dune Field.’
Discovered here is what I speculate to be further evidence of ancient ruins and technology on Mars.
I also found what looks like a wrecked Quimbaya ‘Jet’-type object approximately 20 metres long. I wonder what Giorgio from Ancient Aliens will think of this artefact?
Wrecked Quimbaya ‘Jet’-type object approximately 20 metres long (click for larger image)Quimbaya ‘Jet’ Jewelry (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Ley lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the ley lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_013864_1220) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 11 July 2009. NASA describes the photograph as ‘Sharp Boundary on Crater Floor.’
I discovered another vast terrain on the Martian surface littered with megalithic blocks with knobs or smaller features on top, wrecked craft or machinery/technology.
It looks like I discovered matching objects again.
There may even be a few underground entrance-ways and/or underground habitat ventilation caps shown, only speculating.
I further speculate that the blocks have been arrange somehow and the smaller features have been physically placed on top of them in patterns. Perhaps these are shrines with a special meaning to them. Might this even be a burial ground?
— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Ley lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the ley lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_013864_1220) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 11 July 2009. NASA photograph description: ‘Sharp Boundary on Crater Floor.’
I discovered what may be further evidence of similar derelict/wrecked equipment or objects on Mars.
Similarities between the three objects:
The ‘bumper/scoop’ in front
An opening with a small part sticking out of the opening
A larger convex-shaped fuselage with small dome/sphere-like features on top
A small ‘winglette’ on the side
Measure approximately 10 metres in length
Could these perhaps be similar equipment types but different models (they have small differences)?
All three wrecks are located in the Southern hemisphere on Mars.
Wreckage South East of Douglass Crater (ESP_013864_1220) (click for larger image)Wreckage in Hunten Crater (ESP_028379_1405) (click for larger image)Wreckage in Electris Region (ESP_023929_1425) (click for larger image)The location of the three wrecks (click for larger image)
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Ley lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the ley lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
The photographs analyzed here (ESP_023929_1425 and ESP_028379_1405) were taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 04 September 2011 and 15 August 2012 respectively. Area’s photographs were taken: ‘Electris Region’ and ‘Hunten Crater’ respectively
I discovered what appears to be further evidence of matching derelict equipment or objects on Mars approximately 6000 km apart.
Similarities between both objects:
The ‘bumper/scoop’ in front
‘Arch’ feature on top with a small part sticking out of the opening
A larger convex-shaped fuselage
The one object is totally wrecked while the other is in more pristine condition.
Wreckage I in Hunten Crater (ESP_028379_1405) (click for larger image)Wreckage II in Electris Region (ESP_023929_1425) (click for larger image)Google Earth Mars showing location of wreckages (approx. 6000 km apart) (click for larger image)
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Ley lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the ley lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_023929_1425) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 04 September 2011. NASA describes the photographs as ‘Remnant of Unconformable Deposit in Electris.’
I discovered what appears to be further ancient megalithic ruins consisting of massive, broken megalithic blocks.
Some structures are still relatively intact and show a few blocks that have become dislodged.
Again, there are multiple anomalies that look like wrecked craft, damaged machinery or tech, underground entrance-ways and pieces of sculptures, even what look like a giant hatch.
Are these ancient ruins built by a civilization that lived on Mars in the distant past or were these structures formed through a natural geological processes?
To quote NASA: ‘One goal of this observation is to try to determine the origin of what’s called the ‘mantling deposit.’ How was this deposit placed here?’
Due to the fact that I have discovered multiple sites on Mars with similar matching megalithic blocks and similar objects I speculate these ancient ruins are artificial in nature.
Layered/stepped megalithic blocks/slabs or some type of technology (click for larger image)Layered/stepped megalithic block/s (click for larger image)Smooth megalithic block with rounded edge (click for larger image)Layered/stepped megalithic block or some type of metallic-looking technology (click for larger image)Layered/stepped megalithic blocks/slabs or some type of metallic-looking technology (click for larger image)Metallic-looking plate partially buried with small symmetrical parts on top (click for larger image)Megalithic slab or piece of metallic-looking technology (click for larger image)Megalithic slabs or pieces of metallic-looking technology (click for larger image)Metallic-looking technology, perhaps some type of wrecked craft (click for larger image)Layered/stepped megalithic block/s or slabs or some type of technology or wrecked craft (click for larger image)Layered/stepped megalithic blocks/slabs or some type of technology (click for larger image)Symmetrical megalithic block or some type of technology (click for larger image)Partially buried megalithic block (click for larger image)Layered/stepped megalithic blocks/slabs or some type of technology (click for larger image)Megalithic block (click for larger image)Megalithic block with smaller step carved into one corner (click for larger image)Layered/stepped megalithic blocks/slabs or some type of metallic-looking technology (click for larger image)Bent metallic-looking plate, perhaps underground entrance-way (click for larger image)Strange shaped block, perhaps a piece from a giant sculpture (click for larger image)Megalithic slabs or some type of metallic-looking technology, perhaps underground entrance-way (click for larger image)Rectangular object with what look like two holes or dark spots on one side (click for larger image)Layered/stepped megalithic blocks/slabs or some type of metallic-looking plates or technology (click for larger image)Partially buried metallic-looking technology, perhaps some type of wrecked craft (click for larger image)Megalithic block/slab with smaller knob or feature on top (click for larger image)Layered/stepped megalithic blocks/slabs or some type of metallic-looking technology (click for larger image)Megalithic block in the shape of a cube (click for larger image)Layered/stepped megalithic blocks/slabs or some type of metallic-looking technology (click for larger image)Megalithic block/slab with smaller knobs or features on top (click for larger image)Narrow megalithic slab (click for larger image)Two exposed, inter-locking megalithic blocks with knobs or smaller features on top (click for larger image)Molded object, perhaps from a sculpture (click for larger image)Megalithic blocks/slabs or some type of metallic-looking plates or technology (click for larger image)Large megalithic block with a smaller rectangular block on top (click for larger image)Exposed, inter-locking megalithic blocks (click for larger image)Narrow rectangular parts on opposite sides to a cylindrical object, perhaps a wrecked craft or some type of technology (click for larger image)Stepped/layered piece with smaller knobs or features on top (click for larger image)Two megalithic blocks (click for larger image)Part of a sculpture or some kind of destroyed technology (click for larger image)Megalithic block with multiple smaller features to the left side, perhaps part of a sculpture. It appears the piece lying next to it broke off (click for larger image)Megalithic blocks in the shape of a cubes (click for larger image)Megalithic slabs (click for larger image)Megalithic blocks (click for larger image)Triangular object partially buried in sand (click for larger image)Partially buried megalithic block or technology, note the oblong feature with smaller dome on the side (click for larger image)Megalithic block with multiple smaller features, perhaps part of a sculpture (click for larger image)Rectangular megalithic block (click for larger image)Megalithic block with knob or smaller feature on top (click for larger image)Exposed, inter-locking megalithic blocks (click for larger image)Megalithic blocks with knobs or smaller features on top (click for larger image)Multiple stacked megalithic blocks/slabs (click for larger image)Could this be some type of hatch or wrecked craft? (click for larger image)Hollow object? There seems to be a rounded opening on the one side (click for larger image)Broken sculpture pieces or perhaps smashed technology? (click for larger image)Megalithic block in the shape of a cube (click for larger image)Megalithic blocks (click for larger image)Broken sculpture piece, stepper/layered megalithic block or perhaps smashed technology? (click for larger image)Object in the shape of a heart or leaf, perhaps a sculpture piece? (click for larger image)Narrow megalithic block/slab (click for larger image)Megalithic block with knobs or smaller features on top (click for larger image)Narrow megalithic block/slab (click for larger image)Narrow megalithic block/slab (click for larger image)
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Ley lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the ley lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
The photographs analyzed here (F16_041919_2305_XN_50N278W and ESP_042486_2305) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter on 2015-07-06 and 20 August 2015 respectively. NASA describes the photographs as ‘Ride-along with HiRISE’ and ‘Interesting Feature on Northern Plains’ respectively.
I discovered what looks like another massive megalithic block or structure buried on Mars. It measures approximately 5 km long by 800 metres wide.
This buried object is similar to the one I feature in my ‘The Star Trek 2001 Mars Rendezvous – An Ode to Roddenberry and Clarke’ video.
Partially Buries Megalithic Block or Structure (F16_041919_2305_XN_50N278W – Zoomed Out) (click for larger image)Partially Buries Megalithic Block or Structure (F16_041919_2305_XN_50N278W – Closer View) (click for larger image)Partially Buries Megalithic Block or Structure (F16_041919_2305_XN_50N278W – Actual Size) (click for larger image)Partially Buries Megalithic Block or Structure (ESP_042486_2305 – Top Part) (click for larger image)Partially Buries Megalithic Block or Structure (ESP_042486_2305 – Middle Part), note the smaller objects which include a disc-shaped object with a smaller feature in the center of the object (click for larger image)Partially Buries Megalithic Block or Structure (ESP_042486_2305 – Bottom Part) (click for larger image)
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Ley lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the ley lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
The photograph analyzed here (ESP_028379_1405) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter HiRISE Camera on 15 August 2012. NASA describes the photographs as ‘Fresh Small Crater on Rocky Filled Floor of a Much Larger Crater.’
I discovered what looks like another large debris field on Mars. Seen are more megalithic blocks with knobs, disc-shaped objects with small domes on top and wreckage of machinery or technology.
There is also a really strange hole with a crescent shape step which looks like a possible underground entrance-way or hangar-type door.
Other large holes in the Martian surface appear to have been machined, worked or possibly excavated/mined.
Could all these holes have been excavated artificially?
I’ll add the image descriptions in due course.
Excavated hole/hangar/underground entrance-way approximately 350 metres wide – Zoomed out (click for larger image)Excavated hole/hangar/underground entrance-way approximately 350 metres wide – Zoomed in 1:1 scale (click for larger image)Excavated hole approximately 350 metres wide – Zoomed out (click for larger image)Excavated hole approximately 350 metres wide – Zoomed in 1:1 scale (click for larger image)Small dome-shaped mound and rectangular megalith to the right (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)— (click for larger image)
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Ley lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the ley lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
The photograph analyzed here (PSP_009663_2635) was taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter HiRISE Camera on 18 August 2008. NASA describes the photographs as ‘Crater on the North Polar Layered Deposits.’
I discovered what looks like a large disc/dome-shaped object near the Mars North Pole. The sun seems to be located to the left of the photograph, from the shadow being cast this does not look like a crater at all, instead more like a huge bulge. Also, there doesn’t seem to be a typical crater rim.
I speculate this object might be a dome-like structure or a disc-shaped object with a dome on top that’s covered in sand and snow/ice. The object might even have crashed on the Martian surface when looking at the way the Martian surface material has been pushed to the right.
Could this be an object or structure rather than a typical crater?
Object or structure rather than a typical crater? (click for larger image)
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Ley lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the ley lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
The photograph analyzed here (B17_016259_2199_XN_39N300W) were taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Context Camera (CTX) Camera on 2010-01-14. NASA describes the photographs as “Protonilus/Nilosyrtis fretted terrain – northern plains transition area.’
This is a tribute to two brilliant men, Eugene Roddenberry, creator of the Star Trek television series and Sir Arthur C. Clarke, author or 2001: A Space Odyssey.
Eugene Roddenberry and Sir Arthur C. Clarke
I discovered what looks like the Star Trek Enterprise primary (saucer section) and secondary hulls without warp nacelles parked on the Martian surface and a huge monolith as featured in 2001: A Space Odyssey.
The ‘Enterprise’ measures approximately 300 metres across and the ‘monolith’ approximately 2 km long by 300 metres wide.
I just thought this is a great NASA photograph that unwittingly pays homage to two great guys and the awesome legacy they left for us and future generations.
These anomalies featured in my Viewers Special YouTube video in which I gave my viewers an opportunity to let me know what their take on these anomalies are, however only one viewer responded.
‘Enterprise’ primary (saucer section) and secondary hulls without warp nacelles parked on the Martian surface (click for larger image)The ‘2001: A Space Odyssey Monolith’ lying on the Martian surface covered in sand and dust (click for larger image)
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Ley lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the ley lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
This is a collaborative work between Saturn Ark and RaptorZone in which more anomalies and artefacts are presented.
The photographs analyzed here (D04_028911_0985_XN_81S064W and ESP_021526_0985) were taken by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) CTX and HiRISE Cameras on 26 September 2012 and 28 February 2011 respectively. NASA describes the photographs as “Ride-along with HiRISE” and “Monitoring Defrosting Patterns on Inca City Ridges” respectively.
Discovered recently, this really interesting area located near the South Pole of Mars in an area called Angustus Labyrinthus, seems to show what looks like rectangular walled structures and/or perhaps some type of large-scale farming of some kind.
Ancient ruins, retaining walls or possible farming activity on Mars (D04_028911_0985_XN_81S064W) (click for larger image)
The walls, approximately 100 m thick, form square shapes with very straight sides measuring 3 km in length; highly unusual thus the speculation that these may be artificial and may be evidence of intelligent design. Furthermore we can only speculate whether these are ancient or modern structures as they are partially covered.
Could these be remnants of an ancient structure/building, retaining walls used in some kind of large scale farming? The walled off area’s remind me of rice fields/farming as found here on Earth.
Rice fields/farming in Thailand
Taking a look at this area in Google Earth Mars shows NASA photographed this specific feature many times. What were they looking for? Just monitoring the dark spots to see who they change over time, after all NASA does describe the HiRISE photograph analysed here as “… Inca City Ridges.”
Image rotated 130 degrees clockwise (D04_028911_0985_XN_81S064W) (click for larger image)Image rotated 130 degrees clockwise and zoomed-in (D04_028911_0985_XN_81S064W) (click for larger image)
This anomaly also reminds me of similar geometrically-shaped ‘dunes’ I found in another area of Mars in an area called Schiaparelli approximately 5100 km away:
Strange geometrically-shaped ‘dunes’ (PSP_006754_1790) (click for larger image)
Also, I previously featured what NASA calls an ‘Inca City’ on Mars showing what looks like structures and terraces buried in sand located approximately 13 km to the North-West:
NASA calls this an ‘Inca City’ on Mars: ‘Cross’ (PSP_006204_0985) (click for larger image)
High-Resolution Images:
The following images were cropped from the HiRISE JP2 (ESP_021526_0985):
Small disc-shaped object with smaller dome in the center (click for larger image)Cluster of small ‘Spiders’ and what looks like darker moss-type material (click for larger image)Cluster of medium-sized ‘Spiders’ and what looks like darker moss-type material (click for larger image)Cluster of small ‘Spiders’ and what looks like darker moss-type material (click for larger image)Cluster of small ‘Spiders’ and what looks like darker moss-type material (click for larger image)Cluster of larger ‘Spiders’ and what looks like darker moss-type material (click for larger image)Cluster of small ‘Spiders’ and what looks like darker moss-type material (click for larger image)The Inca-type wall with ‘Spiders’ and what looks like darker moss-type material (click for larger image)A closer look at the Inca-type wall with ‘Spiders’ and what looks like darker moss-type material (click for larger image)
Images saved from within HiView or CTX viewer do not include image scale indicators. The image scale indicators I include in images are based on the official resolutions provided by NASA and although I strive to be as accurate as possible there may be slight deviations from the actual scale. Image scale indicators are included as a size approximation tool only.
Ley lines are mapped as accurately as possible using the limited information, data and mapping tools available at the time, therefore the ley lines may deviate from target sites by a few kilometres. Revisions may be made in the future as new, more precise information, data and mapping tools become available.
Many or all of the anomalies/artefacts covered in this presentation may be naturally occurring geological features caused by some type of geological processes, however due to the lack of specific information from the source we can only speculate whether these are all natural or some artificial in nature.
In cases where I say an anomaly looks like something I’m attempting to clarify what I see and not specifically that the anomaly is what I say it looks like.
My intention is only to share anomalies I’ve discovered on Mars and not to convince anyone that there is or was a civilization on Mars.
As Will Farrar from WhatsUpInTheSky says: “I see what I see, you see what you see.”
